anti brca1 mouse Search Results


91
Bio-Rad brca1
Steady‐state levels of gastric cancer cell lines. Using Western blot assay, steady protein levels of <t>BRCA1,</t> BRCA2 and c‐MET are analysed in primary gastric cancer cell lines HS746T and AGS. Protein levels were normalized against actin
Brca1, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+brca1+mouse/Mouse+anti+BRCA1/pmc07521333-40-4-9
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
brca1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad monoclonal mouse antibodies
FIG. 1. Purification and functional char- acterization of dimeric TRF. A) Chromato- graphic profile of highly purified human TRF. The TRF solution was loaded onto an ultragel Aca44 column as described in Materials and Methods. OD, optical density. B) Each fraction was analyzed using native gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. VLMB, very low-mobility band; LMB, low- mobility band; HMB, high-mobility band. C) Sensorgrams of interaction between high- and low-mobility purified fractions of hTRF and the <t>monoclonal</t> anti-hTRF anti- body. The interaction between both forms of hTRF and the monoclonal antibody is indicated by a dashed line. After reinjection of the monoclonal antibody, only the accessible epitope on the dimeric form generated a secondary signal (dark line), in contrast to the monomeric form (light line). The arrows directed to the top indicate the beginning of injection of the anti-hTRF antibody, and those directed toward the bottom indicate the end of the injections. The principle of discrimination between monomeric versus dimeric TRF by SPR is schematized on the right. RU, resonance units.
Monoclonal Mouse Antibodies, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+brca1+mouse/Mouse+anti+BRCA1+(N-Terminal)/pm18094362-48-0-13
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal mouse antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

85
Bio-Rad western blot with anti brca1 ab 1
FIG. 1. Purification and functional char- acterization of dimeric TRF. A) Chromato- graphic profile of highly purified human TRF. The TRF solution was loaded onto an ultragel Aca44 column as described in Materials and Methods. OD, optical density. B) Each fraction was analyzed using native gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. VLMB, very low-mobility band; LMB, low- mobility band; HMB, high-mobility band. C) Sensorgrams of interaction between high- and low-mobility purified fractions of hTRF and the <t>monoclonal</t> anti-hTRF anti- body. The interaction between both forms of hTRF and the monoclonal antibody is indicated by a dashed line. After reinjection of the monoclonal antibody, only the accessible epitope on the dimeric form generated a secondary signal (dark line), in contrast to the monomeric form (light line). The arrows directed to the top indicate the beginning of injection of the anti-hTRF antibody, and those directed toward the bottom indicate the end of the injections. The principle of discrimination between monomeric versus dimeric TRF by SPR is schematized on the right. RU, resonance units.
Western Blot With Anti Brca1 Ab 1, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+brca1+mouse/Mouse+anti+Human+BRCA1+(N-Terminal)/pmc04245969-145-19-8
Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
western blot with anti brca1 ab 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
85/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

N/A
Mouse anti-Human BRCA1 Antibody (Breast Marker) [Sodium Azide Free]
  Buy from Supplier

N/A
Mouse anti-Human BRCA1 Antibody (Breast Marker) [Sodium Azide Free]
  Buy from Supplier

N/A
Boster Bio BRCA1 mouse monoclonal antibody, clone OTI5D10 (formerly 5D10). Catalog# M00005-1. Tested in IHC, WB. This antibody reacts with Human.
  Buy from Supplier

N/A
Mouse anti-Human BRCA1 Antibody (Breast Marker)
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Steady‐state levels of gastric cancer cell lines. Using Western blot assay, steady protein levels of BRCA1, BRCA2 and c‐MET are analysed in primary gastric cancer cell lines HS746T and AGS. Protein levels were normalized against actin

Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Inhibition of c‐MET increases the antitumour activity of PARP inhibitors in gastric cancer models

doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15655

Figure Lengend Snippet: Steady‐state levels of gastric cancer cell lines. Using Western blot assay, steady protein levels of BRCA1, BRCA2 and c‐MET are analysed in primary gastric cancer cell lines HS746T and AGS. Protein levels were normalized against actin

Article Snippet: Antibodies were used against: BRCA1 (#MCA5946GT) was purchased from Bio‐Rad, BRCA2 (sc‐295185), actin (sc‐8035) and histone H2AX (#sc‐517336) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and PARP‐1 (#9542), cleaved caspase‐3 (#9661) and c‐Met (#8198) from Cell Signaling Technology.

Techniques: Western Blot

Low levels of c‐MET partially sensitize GC cell lines in PARP inhibition. A, HS746T/AGS cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T/AGS cells and si‐c‐MET Hs746T/AGS cells were exposed to increasing doses (0‐40 µmol/L) of NU1025 for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). The protein levels of c‐MET expression (by Western blot analysis) revealed down‐regulation of the c‐MET receptor in both cell lines (HS746T and AGS); (B) HS746T cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T cells and si‐BRCA1/2 Hs746T cells were exposed to increasing doses (0‐40 µmol/L) of NU1025 for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). The protein levels of BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression (by Western blot analysis) revealed down‐regulation of the BRCA1/2 in HS746T cell line; (C) HS746T cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T, siBRCA1/2‐Hs746T and siMET/BRCA1/2‐Hs746T cells were cultured with the indicated concentrations of NU1025 (5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). Error bars represent SD

Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Inhibition of c‐MET increases the antitumour activity of PARP inhibitors in gastric cancer models

doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15655

Figure Lengend Snippet: Low levels of c‐MET partially sensitize GC cell lines in PARP inhibition. A, HS746T/AGS cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T/AGS cells and si‐c‐MET Hs746T/AGS cells were exposed to increasing doses (0‐40 µmol/L) of NU1025 for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). The protein levels of c‐MET expression (by Western blot analysis) revealed down‐regulation of the c‐MET receptor in both cell lines (HS746T and AGS); (B) HS746T cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T cells and si‐BRCA1/2 Hs746T cells were exposed to increasing doses (0‐40 µmol/L) of NU1025 for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). The protein levels of BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression (by Western blot analysis) revealed down‐regulation of the BRCA1/2 in HS746T cell line; (C) HS746T cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T, siBRCA1/2‐Hs746T and siMET/BRCA1/2‐Hs746T cells were cultured with the indicated concentrations of NU1025 (5, 10 and 20 μmol/L) for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). Error bars represent SD

Article Snippet: Antibodies were used against: BRCA1 (#MCA5946GT) was purchased from Bio‐Rad, BRCA2 (sc‐295185), actin (sc‐8035) and histone H2AX (#sc‐517336) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and PARP‐1 (#9542), cleaved caspase‐3 (#9661) and c‐Met (#8198) from Cell Signaling Technology.

Techniques: Inhibition, Control, Metabolic Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Cell Culture

Co‐inhibition of c‐MET (SU11274) and PARP (NU1025) sensitizes GC cells after knockdown BRCA1/2. Knocking down BRCA1 or BRCA2 sensitizes cells to PARP and c‐MET inhibition in HS746T cells expressing low levels of c‐MET (AGS cells, c‐MET knockdown Hs746T cells) to PARP inhibition. A, HS746T cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T cells and siBRCA1/2‐Hs746T (upper panel) and AGS (lower panel) cells were exposed to 5 µmol/L of NU1025 and/or 5 µmol/L of SU11274 for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). Results are expressed as percentages. Average values of three experiments ± SD are shown; (B) Western blot analysis of PARP and cl.caspase‐3 in Hs746T‐control‐siRNA, siBRCA1/2‐Hs746T (upper panel) and AGS (lower panel) cell lines. Cells were cultured with the indicated drugs (5 μmol/L NU1025, 5 μmol/L SU11274 alone or in combination for 24 h of treatment). Protein levels were normalized against actin

Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Inhibition of c‐MET increases the antitumour activity of PARP inhibitors in gastric cancer models

doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15655

Figure Lengend Snippet: Co‐inhibition of c‐MET (SU11274) and PARP (NU1025) sensitizes GC cells after knockdown BRCA1/2. Knocking down BRCA1 or BRCA2 sensitizes cells to PARP and c‐MET inhibition in HS746T cells expressing low levels of c‐MET (AGS cells, c‐MET knockdown Hs746T cells) to PARP inhibition. A, HS746T cells, control‐siRNA‐Hs746T cells and siBRCA1/2‐Hs746T (upper panel) and AGS (lower panel) cells were exposed to 5 µmol/L of NU1025 and/or 5 µmol/L of SU11274 for 48 h for determination of cell viability (MTT metabolic activity assay). Results are expressed as percentages. Average values of three experiments ± SD are shown; (B) Western blot analysis of PARP and cl.caspase‐3 in Hs746T‐control‐siRNA, siBRCA1/2‐Hs746T (upper panel) and AGS (lower panel) cell lines. Cells were cultured with the indicated drugs (5 μmol/L NU1025, 5 μmol/L SU11274 alone or in combination for 24 h of treatment). Protein levels were normalized against actin

Article Snippet: Antibodies were used against: BRCA1 (#MCA5946GT) was purchased from Bio‐Rad, BRCA2 (sc‐295185), actin (sc‐8035) and histone H2AX (#sc‐517336) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and PARP‐1 (#9542), cleaved caspase‐3 (#9661) and c‐Met (#8198) from Cell Signaling Technology.

Techniques: Inhibition, Knockdown, Expressing, Control, Metabolic Assay, Western Blot, Cell Culture

FIG. 1. Purification and functional char- acterization of dimeric TRF. A) Chromato- graphic profile of highly purified human TRF. The TRF solution was loaded onto an ultragel Aca44 column as described in Materials and Methods. OD, optical density. B) Each fraction was analyzed using native gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. VLMB, very low-mobility band; LMB, low- mobility band; HMB, high-mobility band. C) Sensorgrams of interaction between high- and low-mobility purified fractions of hTRF and the monoclonal anti-hTRF anti- body. The interaction between both forms of hTRF and the monoclonal antibody is indicated by a dashed line. After reinjection of the monoclonal antibody, only the accessible epitope on the dimeric form generated a secondary signal (dark line), in contrast to the monomeric form (light line). The arrows directed to the top indicate the beginning of injection of the anti-hTRF antibody, and those directed toward the bottom indicate the end of the injections. The principle of discrimination between monomeric versus dimeric TRF by SPR is schematized on the right. RU, resonance units.

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Dimeric transferrin inhibits phagocytosis of residual bodies by testicular rat Sertoli cells.

doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.063107

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIG. 1. Purification and functional char- acterization of dimeric TRF. A) Chromato- graphic profile of highly purified human TRF. The TRF solution was loaded onto an ultragel Aca44 column as described in Materials and Methods. OD, optical density. B) Each fraction was analyzed using native gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. VLMB, very low-mobility band; LMB, low- mobility band; HMB, high-mobility band. C) Sensorgrams of interaction between high- and low-mobility purified fractions of hTRF and the monoclonal anti-hTRF anti- body. The interaction between both forms of hTRF and the monoclonal antibody is indicated by a dashed line. After reinjection of the monoclonal antibody, only the accessible epitope on the dimeric form generated a secondary signal (dark line), in contrast to the monomeric form (light line). The arrows directed to the top indicate the beginning of injection of the anti-hTRF antibody, and those directed toward the bottom indicate the end of the injections. The principle of discrimination between monomeric versus dimeric TRF by SPR is schematized on the right. RU, resonance units.

Article Snippet: Monoclonal mouse antibodies raised against the N-terminal domain of human TRF were from AbD Serotec (Cergy Saint-Christophe, France).

Techniques: Purification, Functional Assay, Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis, Western Blot, Generated, Injection